Skip to content

Law Offices of Stuart M. Flashman
  • (510)-652-5373
  • stu@stuflash.com
  • Home
  • Professional Background
  • Practice Areas
    • Environmental Law
    • Land Use Law
    • Elections Law
  • Clients and Cases
  • Resources
    • Articles
      • Smart Growth vs. Wisely Planned Communities
      • Does CEQA have a future?
      • A Short Diatribe on Political Campaign Reform
  • Blog
  • Contact

Year: 2022

  1. Browse

    • Home
    • 2022

July 28, 2022 stuflash Post in high-speed rail,litigation Leave a Comment on Appellate Courts Reject Challenge to Prop. 1A Compliance – Short-term Win; Long-term Damage

Appellate Courts Reject Challenge to Prop. 1A Compliance – Short-term Win; Long-term Damage

Looking beyond how the Prop. 1A bond funds will be used, the court of appeal's decision is likely to cause major damage to the trust California voters place in promises made in bond measures placed before them for approval.

Continue Reading

About Stuart Flashman

Stuart Flashman is a solo practitioner with 29 years of experience in environmental, land use, and elections law.

Recent Posts

  • Appellate Courts Reject Challenge to Prop. 1A Compliance – Short-term Win; Long-term Damage
  • Dublin lawsuit brings media interest
  • California High-Speed Rail Authority Faces New Obstacles (Part IV)
  • California High-Speed Rail Authority Faces New Obstacles (Part III)

Address
5626 Ocean View Drive
Oakland, CA 94618-1533
(510) 652-5373 (voice & fax)
stu@stuflash.com

Please be aware that contacting Dr. Flashman, either by telephone or e-mail, does not, in itself, establish an attorney-client relationship.

  • Home
  • Professional Background
  • Practice Areas
    • Environmental Law
    • Land Use Law
    • Elections Law
  • Clients and Cases
  • Resources
    • Articles
      • Smart Growth vs. Wisely Planned Communities
      • Does CEQA have a future?
      • A Short Diatribe on Political Campaign Reform
  • Blog
  • Contact

| Developed & Design by AmpleThemes